An agent authorised only to sell travel insurance for an insurer purports to grant fire cover on a client's shop. Until the insurer decides, the proposed fire contract is:
Answer: technically void, but open to ratification. A contract made without authority from the insurer is technically void, but the insurer may subsequently accept the insurance and confirm cover, so the contract becomes valid retrospectively.Why not the others:• voidable at the client's option: The defect is lack of authority, which gives the client no such option.• unenforceable until a policy is issued: The problem is lack of authority, not a missing policy.• valid and binding on the insurer from the start: The agent had no authority for fire business, so the insurer is not bound unless it ratifies.Watch out: Assuming any cover granted by an insurer's agent binds the insurer.Rule: Cover granted without authority is technically void unless the principal ratifies it.Source: IA P1 Study Notes, 2024 Edition (8th ed., Nov 2024; for exams from 17 Feb 2025), 2.2.2(b), p. 2/6
Assuming any cover granted by an insurer's agent binds the insurer.
Practise more IIQE Paper 1 Legal Principles questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material written to the public IIQE Paper 1 syllabus. Independent, not endorsed by the Insurance Authority or the VTC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.