Four years after issue, an insurer discovers that the policyowner had no insurable interest in the life insured when the policy was taken out. The incontestability provision:
Answer: does not stop the insurer raising the illegality. The clause leaves the insurer free to argue that the contract is illegal, and lack of insurable interest is a standard example of illegality.Why not the others:• allows the point to be raised only in the first two years: The two-year limit applies to contesting validity on other grounds, not to illegality.• bars the insurer from raising the point once two years have passed: Illegality, such as lack of insurable interest, is outside the clause's protection.• turns the policy into a valid contract after the contestable period: The clause cannot make an illegal contract valid.Watch out: Assuming the clause covers every ground of challenge, including illegality.Rule: Incontestability does not prevent the insurer raising illegality, e.g. lack of insurable interest.Source: IA Long Term Insurance (Paper III) Study Notes, 2022 Edition (8th ed., June 2022; for exams from 24 Oct 2022), 4.2(c), p. 4/3
Assuming the clause covers every ground of challenge, including illegality.
Practise more IIQE Paper 3 Explaining the Life Insurance Policy questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material written to the public IIQE Paper 3 syllabus. Independent, not endorsed by the Insurance Authority or the VTC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.